Un método 3D para estimar el efecto de osteotomías desrotadoras sobre alteraciones torsionales de fémur / A 3D method to estimate the effect of derotational osteotomies over femoral maltorsion

Introducción y objetivos: La medición precisa de la torsión femoral es esencial para el diagnóstico, indicación y planificación preoperatoria de las osteotomías desrotadoras femorales en pacientes con inestabilidad patelofemoral o dolor anterior de rodilla. Se han descrito múltiples métodos de medición, con valores muy diferentes entre ellos y ninguno de ellos permite establecer la magnitud de la osteotomía necesaria para devolver la torsión a valores normales. El objetivo del presente trabajo es desarrollar un método de medición que permita no solo el diagnóstico de pacientes con alteraciones torsionales, sino también establecer la magnitud de la osteotomía necesaria durante la cirugía. Material y métodos: Se seleccionaron 30 pacientes sin antecedentes de patología patelofemoral que disponían de una tomografía completa de miembros inferiores por otros motivos, siendo considerados así pacientes normales. Se calculó su torsión femoral mediante los métodos de Jeanmart y de Murphy por dos radiólogos independientes. Por otra parte, dos cirujanos ortopédicos independientes realizaron la medición de la torsión mediante el método 3D propuesto. Se evaluó el comportamiento normal de los datos y se definió la variabilidad intra- e interobservador del método 3D mediante su coeficiente de correlación intraclase y mediante el gráfico de Bland-Altman, realizando una comparación cuantitativa y cualitativa respectivamente con los métodos clásicos. Se estableció el intervalo de confianza de los valores normales con el nuevo método 3D y finalmente, se analizó al patrón de regresión lineal entre los métodos de Jeanmart y Murphy con el método de medición 3D. Resultados: La media de torsión femoral con el método 3D fue de 12,74° (DE 5,96°, IC 95%: 11,67 a 13,82°). Con el método de Jeanmart, esta fue de 12,84° (DE 8,60°, IC 95%: 11,28 a 14,39°) y de 15,87° (DE 10,68°, IC 95%: 13,94 a 17,80°) con el método de Murphy.(AU)

Introduction and objectives: Accurate measurement of femoral torsion is essential to diagnosing, correct surgical decision-making, and the preoperative planning of derotational osteotomies in a subgroup of anterior knee pain patients and patellofemoral instability. Several measurement techniques have been described with great variability in the magnitude of the values. Moreover, none of them can predict the effect of rotational osteotomy on the femoral version value. The purpose of the present work is to develop a method to reliably measure femoral torsion as well as to evaluate the effects of osteotomy on the femoral version angle. Material and methods: 30 patients without previous signs neither symptoms of patellofemoral pain or patellofemoral instability and with a lower limbs CT were selected. Their femoral torsion was measured using the classic Jeanmart and the Murphy's method by two independent radiologists. Independently, two orthopedic surgeons measured femoral torsion with the 3D method described in this study. The intraclass coefficient correlation and the Bland–Altman tests were used to analyze qualitatively and quantitatively the intraobserver and interobserver variability of the method regarding the Jeanmart's and Murphy's method. The confidence interval of the Normal values of the new method were defined and a lineal regression analysis between the 3D-Jeanmart's and 3D-Muphy's methods was performed. Results: The mean femoral version with the 3D method was 12.74° (SD 5.96°, 95% CI: 11.67° to 13.82°). With Jeanmart's method, it was 12.84° (SD 8.60°, 95% CI: 11.28° to 14.39°) and 15.87° (SD 10.68°, 95% CI: 13.94° to 17.80°) with Murphy's method, being these differences not statistically significant. Both interobserver and intraobserver agreement of the 3D method were high.(AU)

[Translated article] A 3D method to estimate the effect of derotational osteotomies over femoral maltorsion / Un método 3D para estimar el efecto de osteotomías desrotadoras sobre alteraciones torsionales de fémur

Introducción y objetivos: La medición precisa de la torsión femoral es esencial para el diagnóstico, indicación y planificación preoperatoria de las osteotomías desrotadoras femorales en pacientes con inestabilidad patelofemoral o dolor anterior de rodilla. Se han descrito múltiples métodos de medición, con valores muy diferentes entre ellos y ninguno de ellos permite establecer la magnitud de la osteotomía necesaria para devolver la torsión a valores normales. El objetivo del presente trabajo es desarrollar un método de medición que permita no solo el diagnóstico de pacientes con alteraciones torsionales, sino también establecer la magnitud de la osteotomía necesaria durante la cirugía. Material y métodos: Se seleccionaron 30 pacientes sin antecedentes de patología patelofemoral que disponían de una tomografía completa de miembros inferiores por otros motivos, siendo considerados así pacientes normales. Se calculó su torsión femoral mediante los métodos de Jeanmart y de Murphy por dos radiólogos independientes. Por otra parte, dos cirujanos ortopédicos independientes realizaron la medición de la torsión mediante el método 3D propuesto. Se evaluó el comportamiento normal de los datos y se definió la variabilidad intra- e interobservador del método 3D mediante su coeficiente de correlación intraclase y mediante el gráfico de Bland-Altman, realizando una comparación cuantitativa y cualitativa respectivamente con los métodos clásicos. Se estableció el intervalo de confianza de los valores normales con el nuevo método 3D y finalmente, se analizó al patrón de regresión lineal entre los métodos de Jeanmart y Murphy con el método de medición 3D. Resultados: La media de torsión femoral con el método 3D fue de 12,74° (DE 5,96°, IC 95%: 11,67 a 13,82°). Con el método de Jeanmart, esta fue de 12,84° (DE 8,60°, IC 95%: 11,28 a 14,39°) y de 15,87° (DE 10,68°, IC 95%: 13,94 a 17,80°) con el método de Murphy.(AU)

Introduction and objectives: Accurate measurement of femoral torsion is essential to diagnosing, correct surgical decision-making, and the preoperative planning of derotational osteotomies in a subgroup of anterior knee pain patients and patellofemoral instability. Several measurement techniques have been described with great variability in the magnitude of the values. Moreover, none of them can predict the effect of rotational osteotomy on the femoral version value. The purpose of the present work is to develop a method to reliably measure femoral torsion as well as to evaluate the effects of osteotomy on the femoral version angle. Material and methods: 30 patients without previous signs neither symptoms of patellofemoral pain or patellofemoral instability and with a lower limbs CT were selected. Their femoral torsion was measured using the classic Jeanmart and the Murphy's method by two independent radiologists. Independently, two orthopedic surgeons measured femoral torsion with the 3D method described in this study. The intraclass coefficient correlation and the Bland–Altman tests were used to analyze qualitatively and quantitatively the intraobserver and interobserver variability of the method regarding the Jeanmart's and Murphy's method. The confidence interval of the Normal values of the new method were defined and a lineal regression analysis between the 3D-Jeanmart's and 3D-Muphy's methods was performed. Results: The mean femoral version with the 3D method was 12.74° (SD 5.96°, 95% CI: 11.67° to 13.82°). With Jeanmart's method, it was 12.84° (SD 8.60°, 95% CI: 11.28° to 14.39°) and 15.87° (SD 10.68°, 95% CI: 13.94° to 17.80°) with Murphy's method, being these differences not statistically significant. Both interobserver and intraobserver agreement of the 3D method were high.(AU)

[Translated article] A 3D method to estimate the effect of derotational osteotomies over femoral maltorsion.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Accurate measurement of femoral torsion is essential to diagnosing, correct surgical decision-making, and the preoperative planning of derotational osteotomies in a subgroup of anterior knee pain patients and patellofemoral instability. Several measurement techniques have been described with great variability in the magnitude of the values. Moreover, none of them can predict the effect of rotational osteotomy on the femoral version value. The purpose of the present work is to develop a method to reliably measure femoral torsion as well as to evaluate the effects of osteotomy on the femoral version angle. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 30 patients without previous signs neither symptoms of patellofemoral pain or patellofemoral instability and with a lower limbs CT were selected. Their femoral torsion was measured using the classic Jeanmart and the Murphy's method by two independent radiologists. Independently, two orthopedic surgeons measured femoral torsion with the 3D method described in this study. The intraclass coefficient correlation and the Bland-Altman tests were used to analyze qualitatively and quantitatively the intraobserver and interobserver variability of the method regarding the Jeanmart's and Murphy's method. The confidence interval of the Normal values of the new method were defined and a lineal regression analysis between the 3D-Jeanmart's and 3D-Muphy's methods was performed. RESULTS: The mean femoral version with the 3D method was 12.74° (SD 5.96°, 95% CI: 11.67°-13.82°). With Jeanmart's method, it was 12.84° (SD 8.60°, 95% CI: 11.28°-14.39°) and 15.87° (SD 10.68°, 95% CI: 13.94°-17.80°) with Murphy's method, being these differences not statistically significant. Both interobserver and intraobserver agreement of the 3D method were high. CONCLUSION: The method presented in this study allows for the reliable quantification of femoral torsion in a reproducible way. This method can be applied in several open access 3D image programmes what makes its implementation in the healthcare centres possible from now on.

A 3D method to estimate the effect of derotational osteotomies over femoral maltorsion. / Un método 3D para estimar el efecto de osteotomías desrotadoras sobre alteraciones torsionales de fémur.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Accurate measurement of femoral torsion is essential to diagnosing, correct surgical decision-making, and the preoperative planning of derotational osteotomies in a subgroup of anterior knee pain patients and patellofemoral instability. Several measurement techniques have been described with great variability in the magnitude of the values. Moreover, none of them can predict the effect of rotational osteotomy on the femoral version value. The purpose of the present work is to develop a method to reliably measure femoral torsion as well as to evaluate the effects of osteotomy on the femoral version angle. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 30 patients without previous signs neither symptoms of patellofemoral pain or patellofemoral instability and with a lower limbs CT were selected. Their femoral torsion was measured using the classic Jeanmart and the Murphy's method by two independent radiologists. Independently, two orthopedic surgeons measured femoral torsion with the 3D method described in this study. The intraclass coefficient correlation and the Bland-Altman tests were used to analyze qualitatively and quantitatively the intraobserver and interobserver variability of the method regarding the Jeanmart's and Murphy's method. The confidence interval of the Normal values of the new method were defined and a lineal regression analysis between the 3D-Jeanmart's and 3D-Muphy's methods was performed. RESULTS: The mean femoral version with the 3D method was 12.74° (SD 5.96°, 95% CI: 11.67° to 13.82°). With Jeanmart's method, it was 12.84° (SD 8.60°, 95% CI: 11.28° to 14.39°) and 15.87° (SD 10.68°, 95% CI: 13.94° to 17.80°) with Murphy's method, being these differences not statistically significant. Both interobserver and intraobserver agreement of the 3D method were high. CONCLUSION: The method presented in this study allows for the reliable quantification of femoral torsion in a reproducible way. This method can be applied in several open access 3D image programs what makes its implementation in the healthcare centers possible from now on.

The Retornus-2 study: impact of respiratory muscle training in subacute stroke patients with dysphagia, study protocol of a double-blind randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Stroke can lead to varying degrees of oropharyngeal dysphagia, respiratory muscle dysfunction and even increase medical complications such as aspiration, malnutrition and death. Recent studies suggest that inspiratory and expiratory respiratory muscle training (IEMT) can improve swallowing efficacy and may reduce aspiration events. The main purpose of this study is to examine whether an 8-week IEMT programme can improve respiratory muscle strength and swallow dysfunction severity in subacute stroke patients with dysphagia. METHODS: Retornus-2 is a two-arm, prospectively registered, randomized controlled study with blinded assessors and the participation of fifty individuals who have suffered a stroke. The intervention group undergoes IEMT training consisting of 5 sets of 10 repetitions, three times a day for 8 weeks. Training loads increase weekly. The control group undergoes a sham-IEMT protocol. The primary outcome examines the efficacy of the IEMT protocol to increase respiratory muscle strength and reduce dysphagia severity. The secondary outcome assesses the longitudinal impact of dysphagia on body composition and nutritional assessment over a 6-month follow-up. DISCUSSION: IEMT induces an improvement in respiratory muscle strength and might be associated with relevant benefits in dysphagia patterns, as well as a reduction in the number of aspiration events confirmed by videofluoroscopy or fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing. The description of the impact of swallowing impairment on nutritional status will help develop new strategies to face this known side-effect. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03021252. Registered on 10 January 2017. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/results?cond=retornus+2&term=&cntry=ES&state=&city=&dist= WHO trial Registration data set: Due to heavy traffic generated by the COVID-19 outbreak, the ICTRP Search Portal does not respond. The portal recommends other registries such as clinicaltrials.gov. Protocol version: RETORNUS 2_ PROTOCOL_2.

Variación de tamaño de la hiperplasia nodular focal mediante resonancia magnética / Variations in the size of focal nodular hyperplasia on magnetic resonance imaging

Objetivo. Evaluar los cambios en el tamaño de la hiperplasia nodular focal (HNF) mediante seguimiento a largo plazo con resonancia magnética (RM). Material y métodos. Se revisaron 44 HNF de 30 pacientes, estudiadas mediante RM con al menos 2 estudios separados como mínimo 12 meses. Se midió (en mm) el diámetro mayor de la lesión en las imágenes transversales de RM con contraste, calculándose el porcentaje de variación como la diferencia entre el diámetro máximo en el seguimiento respecto al diámetro máximo inicial. Se definió como variación significativa de tamaño un porcentaje de variación superior al 20%. Se analizaron los factores hormonales predisponentes. Resultados. La media del intervalo de tiempo entre las 2 pruebas de imagen fue de 35 ± 2 meses (rango: 12-94). La mayoría de las lesiones (80%) permanecieron estables durante el seguimiento, y solo 9 de las 44 lesiones (20%) mostraron una variación significativa de su diámetro. Siete de ellas (16%) disminuyeron de tamaño y 2 (4%) aumentaron, con variaciones que alcanzaron hasta el doble del tamaño inicial. El cambio de tamaño no se pudo relacionar con el embarazo, la menopausia ni el uso de anticonceptivos orales o corticoides. Conclusión. Los cambios de tamaño de la HNF durante el seguimiento son relativamente frecuentes y no deben disuadir de este diagnóstico. Estas variaciones parecen independientes de los factores hormonales considerados como predisponentes (AU)

Objective: To evaluate the changes in the size of focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) during long- term magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) follow-up. Material and methods: We reviewed 44 FNHs in 30 patients studied with MRI with at least two MRI studies at least 12 months apart. We measured the largest diameter of the lesion (in mm) in contrast-enhanced axial images and calculated the percentage of variation as the difference between the maximum diameter in the follow-up and the maximum diameter in the initial study. We defined significant variation in size as variation greater than 20%. We also analyzed predisposing hormonal factors. Results: The mean interval between the two imaging studies was 35 ± 2 months (range: 12-94). Most lesions (80%) remained stable during follow-up. Only 9 of the 44 lesions (20%) showed a significant variation in diameter: 7 (16%) decreased in size and 2 (4%) increased, with variations that reached the double of the initial size. The change in size was not related to pregnancy, menopause, or the use of birth control pills or corticoids. Conclusion: Changes in the size of FNHs during follow-up are relatively common and should not lead to a change in the diagnosis. These variations in size seem to be independent of hormonal factors that are considered to predispose (AU)

Variations in the size of focal nodular hyperplasia on magnetic resonance imaging.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the changes in the size of focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) during long-term magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) follow-up. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We reviewed 44 FNHs in 30 patients studied with MRI with at least two MRI studies at least 12 months apart. We measured the largest diameter of the lesion (inmm) in contrast-enhanced axial images and calculated the percentage of variation as the difference between the maximum diameter in the follow-up and the maximum diameter in the initial study. We defined significant variation in size as variation greater than 20%. We also analyzed predisposing hormonal factors. RESULTS: The mean interval between the two imaging studies was 35±2 months (range: 12-94). Most lesions (80%) remained stable during follow-up. Only 9 of the 44 lesions (20%) showed a significant variation in diameter: 7 (16%) decreased in size and 2 (4%) increased, with variations that reached the double of the initial size. The change in size was not related to pregnancy, menopause, or the use of birth control pills or corticoids. CONCLUSION: Changes in the size of FNHs during follow-up are relatively common and should not lead to a change in the diagnosis. These variations in size seem to be independent of hormonal factors that are considered to predispose.